tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post5236962593807668571..comments2023-07-06T00:12:25.395+10:00Comments on We'll Have A Bowl: Super Over ShenanigansJBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17441666338383100642noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-63947329968021317512010-03-02T20:43:40.907+11:002010-03-02T20:43:40.907+11:00That is, if Tait has a 5th over in him...that appe...That is, if Tait has a 5th over in him...that appears doubtful. Yeah, I'll stick with D. Hussey there...My point is though that there should be greater ramifications for a batsman swinging freely with his eyes closed in what is a one over lottery...Master Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00674054900515007793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-60854420659833496942010-03-02T20:36:43.052+11:002010-03-02T20:36:43.052+11:00The Professor also just suggested to me something ...The Professor also just suggested to me something similar to indoor cricket, where if you lose a wicket, you lose 5 runs. I like it. That way D. Hussey-esque economy can be negated by Tait-esque wicket-taking.Master Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00674054900515007793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-85067013678803369432010-03-02T12:20:07.614+11:002010-03-02T12:20:07.614+11:00Hmmm... I reckon Pup has not hit the stumps since ...Hmmm... I reckon Pup has not hit the stumps since he started dating Bingle.<br /><br />I offer no explanation, just the observationDanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03414706451646752998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-39229336049564181722010-03-02T10:00:52.706+11:002010-03-02T10:00:52.706+11:00Yeah Tait only needs to lose the radar for two bal...Yeah Tait only needs to lose the radar for two balls and it's Super Over over. Like finishing a huge night on the piss at Pancakes, a very risky choice...<br /><br />Just when you start lamenting the loss of Boof Lehmann's slow 'spin' bowling and 45 second overs, along comes D. Hussey! That would have been the ballsy option for Pup, but he appears to have no balls as well as no radar. He missed the stumps at least 4 times in that match. Just reading the news this morning...perhaps his mind is elsewhere...Master Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00674054900515007793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-12577428207380157822010-03-02T09:09:34.064+11:002010-03-02T09:09:34.064+11:00Oh, also, can commentators STFU about Pup's fi...Oh, also, can commentators STFU about Pup's fielding. Every single time there's a run out chance, he throws and misses the stumps and the commentators say 'Oooh, only just missed there. Very risky to take Clarke on, he almost never misses'.<br /><br />Commentators? He <i>always</i> misses. Seriously. When was the last time Pup effected a run-out with a direct hit?Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03414706451646752998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7743563958457915835.post-36192339807356976542010-03-02T09:07:26.588+11:002010-03-02T09:07:26.588+11:00Also, Tait as your bowler? This is fine if you'...Also, Tait as your bowler? This is fine if you're going to try and get two wickets in the over. Well, maybe not 'fine', but some sort of plan.<br /><br />But if you're going to go with this plan, then give him some slips, Pup.<br /><br />I still say they should have bowled David Hussey. He would have been five balls into the over before the Kiwis had even taken guard.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03414706451646752998noreply@blogger.com